Music Censorship Essay -- Censoring Censorship Music Lyrics Essays

Music CensorshipToday, in the 1990s, citizens in our society be being bombarded with obscene material from every(prenominal) direction. From the hate lyrics of Guns N Roses to the satanic lyrics of Montley Crue and Marilyn Manson to the sexually explicit graphical content of todays movies, the have it off is how much society is going to permit and where we, as a society, should we eviscerate the line. The freedom of address has always been considered a right, but that doesnt mean that you abide shout, Fire in a crowded movie theater. The real distrust is whether such material is harmful or dangerous to our society.Many commonwealth are asking whether or non we should outlaw offensive material. They guess that some material is too obscene for society to hear or see. The advocates of censorship get riled up because the movie rating council doesnt recrudesce a move an R-rating for having the occasional f- reciprocation. One rap group, 2 resist Crew, has already had one of t heir albums banned because in one song they employ explicit references to male genitals and 87 references to oral sex. They used the word bitch more than 100 times and the f-word more than 200 times.Although or so masses agree that we are being overwhelmed with offensive material, there is no consensus on how to deal with the problem. There are three possible solutions. The kickoff is the possibility of government censorship, which would include laws and penalties for breaking these laws. The second solution is self-imposed censorship by individuals and corporations. The third solution is total free speech with no censorship.The offset printing possible solution is government censorship. In the ult government legal actions have been taken to control offensive messages. For example, in 1988, the Ku Klux Klan wanted to appear on a Kansas City, Missouri worldly concern main course cable channel. The city council decided that it would be better to shut the public access cable ch annel down instead of letting the KKK occupation their show. Later, under the pressure of being sued, the city council reversed their decision.Critics of this sort of action agree that these offensive messages do exist, but legal action is not the way to deal with them. They call up that no individual acts the way the messages confront just because the messages exist. Another belief is that legal actions will intimidate inventive people because it mak... ...ce Clay, considered offensive by some, shouldnt be censored from those who find him wryFreedom of speech is an important part of any democratic country. time some people may find Rush Limbaughs portrayal of chairman Clinton offensive, his show should not be censored. This is the price that we pay to live freely in a democratic society.Censorship does not have to be the solution. You always have the right to change the channel or present down a book. You have control over what you hear, see, or read. You are not forced to see or hear the offensive speech.Opponents of the first-class honours degree amendment view believe that just saying no is not enough. For example, children near likely will not say no. This is why these people believe that the government should at least have the right to censor what children see.Some people believe that censorship is the answer, others do not. I believe that this issue will be left up to the courts to decide. I misgiving that the media may become a swamp of regulations with no more recreation value whatsoever, and I hope that this never happens. I think that the first amendment is a great right and that we should never abridge it.